Assessor Resource

MSS407013
Review continuous improvement processes

Assessment tool

Version 1.0
Issue Date: May 2024


This unit of competency covers the skills and knowledge required to undertake the local level review and further development of an existing continuous improvement (kaizen) process.

This unit is intended for team leaders and people with a similar sphere of influence/scope of authority and responsibility. It applies to individuals who are already familiar with change leadership in a competitive systems and practices environment through either previous study or industry experience.

Skills covered by this unit apply to the review of existing continuous improvement processes in a team, area or department environment, or a small or medium sized enterprise (SME). This unit may also be applied to service organisations applying competitive systems and practices principles.

No licensing, legislative or certification requirements apply to this unit at the time of publication.

You may want to include more information here about the target group and the purpose of the assessments (eg formative, summative, recognition)



Evidence Required

List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.

Elements describe the essential outcomes.

Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element.

1

Review continuous improvement practice

1.1

Review performance against current key performance indicators (KPIs).

1.2

Review KPIs for ongoing relevance.

1.3

Review current state of continuous improvement processes.

1.4

Audit sustainability (social, ecological and economic) changes as a result of continuous improvement activity.

1.5

Analyse problems to determine root cause.

1.6

Identify areas for improvement to KPIs and continuous improvement processes.

2

Develop plan for enhancing improvement processes

2.1

Prioritise areas requiring action.

2.2

Develop a range of possible solutions, including taking into account the impact of the solution on any codes of practice, standards, contracts and commercial or industrial agreements.

2.3

Discuss possible solutions and implications with stakeholders.

2.4

Compare outcomes from possible solutions to competitive systems and practices philosophy.

2.5

Choose actions which are most compatible with competitive philosophy.

2.6

Draft implementation plan for chosen action.

2.7

Obtain required approvals and modify plan, as required.

3

Implement enhanced improvement process

3.1

Communicate changes to improvement processes to team members.

3.2

Resolve issues and problems identified by team members.

3.3

Obtain sign-off from process/system owner.

3.4

Arrange for skills development as necessary.

3.5

Arrange for required resources to be available.

3.6

Establish and implement KPIs for modified continuous improvement process.

3.7

Implement planned changes.

3.8

Check the planned improvements have occurred.

3.9

Take action to sustain improvement by standardising.

Evidence required to demonstrate competence in this unit must be relevant to and satisfy the requirements of the elements and performance criteria and include the ability to review continuous improvement (kaizen) processes on one (1) or more occasions and to:

review current kaizen practices and outcomes

develop a plan for enhancing kaizen processes

implement the improved processes and check that improvement has occurred.

Must provide evidence that demonstrates sufficient knowledge to interact with relevant personnel and be able to improve kaizen processes, including knowledge of:

kaizen processes and their implementation

KPIs, their contributions and distinction between KPIs leading to suboptimal performance and those optimising the whole

competitive systems and practices tools relevant to the organisation and the processes

relevant legislation, regulation, codes of practice, contracts and the like

sustainability principles relevant to the process

influence, persuasion and negotiation methods.

The unit should be assessed holistically and the judgement of competence shall be based on a holistic assessment of the evidence.

The collection of performance evidence is best done from a report and/or folio of evidence drawn from:

a single project which provides sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria

multiple smaller projects which together provide sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria.

A third-party report, or similar, may be needed to testify to the work done by the individual, particularly when the project has been done as part of a project team.

Assessment should use a real review of kaizen processes used in an operational workplace.

Knowledge evidence may be collected concurrently with performance evidence or through an independent process such as workbooks, written assessments or interviews (provided a record is kept).

Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate.

Conditions for assessment must include access to all tools, equipment, materials and documentation required, including relevant workplace procedures, product and manufacturing specifications associated with this unit.

Foundation skills are integral to competent performance of the unit and should not be assessed separately.

Assessors must satisfy the assessor competency requirements that are in place at the time of the assessment as set by the VET regulator.

The assessor must demonstrate both technical competency and currency.

Technical competence can be demonstrated through:

relevant VET or other qualification/Statement of Attainment AND/OR

relevant workplace experience

Currency can be demonstrated through:

performing the competency being assessed as part of current employment OR

having consulted with an organisation providing relevant environmental monitoring, management or technology services about performing the competency being assessed within the last twelve months.


Submission Requirements

List each assessment task's title, type (eg project, observation/demonstration, essay, assingnment, checklist) and due date here

Assessment task 1: [title]      Due date:

(add new lines for each of the assessment tasks)


Assessment Tasks

Copy and paste from the following data to produce each assessment task. Write these in plain English and spell out how, when and where the task is to be carried out, under what conditions, and what resources are needed. Include guidelines about how well the candidate has to perform a task for it to be judged satisfactory.

Elements describe the essential outcomes.

Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element.

1

Review continuous improvement practice

1.1

Review performance against current key performance indicators (KPIs).

1.2

Review KPIs for ongoing relevance.

1.3

Review current state of continuous improvement processes.

1.4

Audit sustainability (social, ecological and economic) changes as a result of continuous improvement activity.

1.5

Analyse problems to determine root cause.

1.6

Identify areas for improvement to KPIs and continuous improvement processes.

2

Develop plan for enhancing improvement processes

2.1

Prioritise areas requiring action.

2.2

Develop a range of possible solutions, including taking into account the impact of the solution on any codes of practice, standards, contracts and commercial or industrial agreements.

2.3

Discuss possible solutions and implications with stakeholders.

2.4

Compare outcomes from possible solutions to competitive systems and practices philosophy.

2.5

Choose actions which are most compatible with competitive philosophy.

2.6

Draft implementation plan for chosen action.

2.7

Obtain required approvals and modify plan, as required.

3

Implement enhanced improvement process

3.1

Communicate changes to improvement processes to team members.

3.2

Resolve issues and problems identified by team members.

3.3

Obtain sign-off from process/system owner.

3.4

Arrange for skills development as necessary.

3.5

Arrange for required resources to be available.

3.6

Establish and implement KPIs for modified continuous improvement process.

3.7

Implement planned changes.

3.8

Check the planned improvements have occurred.

3.9

Take action to sustain improvement by standardising.

This field allows for different work environments and conditions that may affect performance. Essential operating conditions that may be present (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) are included.

Competitive systems and practices include one or more of:

lean operations

agile operations

preventative and predictive maintenance approaches

statistical process control systems, including six sigma and three sigma

Just in Time (JIT), kanban and other pull-related operations control systems

supply, value, and demand chain monitoring and analysis

5S

continuous improvement (kaizen)

breakthrough improvement (kaizen blitz)

cause/effect diagrams

overall equipment effectiveness (OEE)

takt time

process mapping

problem solving

run charts

standard procedures

current reality tree.

Relevance of KPIs includes consideration of all of:

appropriateness (did they lead to/encourage desirable performance?)

currency (are they still encouraging desirable performance?)

unintended consequences (do they lead to outcomes which are not desirable, even if some performance is desirable?)

signal/noise (is the balance between desirable and undesirable outcomes strong and positive?).

Bases for comparing outcomes include one or more of:

benefit/cost

timing

value stream implications

sustainability issues

process reliability issues

benefit to customer/perceived customer benefit.

Required resources include consideration of all of:

plant/equipment

materials (e.g. raw materials, components, work in progress and other consumables)

energy (e.g. heating, cooling and fuel)

people

skills

finances

feedback/visual enterprise resources

measuring equipment.

Techniques for sustaining improvement include one or more of:

standard procedures and work instructions

standard practice

other relevant documents and practices.

Team leader includes one or more of:

a person who has a formal, permanent role

a person with an ad hoc role in facilitating the function of a team in a workplace.

Evidence required to demonstrate competence in this unit must be relevant to and satisfy the requirements of the elements and performance criteria and include the ability to review continuous improvement (kaizen) processes on one (1) or more occasions and to:

review current kaizen practices and outcomes

develop a plan for enhancing kaizen processes

implement the improved processes and check that improvement has occurred.

Must provide evidence that demonstrates sufficient knowledge to interact with relevant personnel and be able to improve kaizen processes, including knowledge of:

kaizen processes and their implementation

KPIs, their contributions and distinction between KPIs leading to suboptimal performance and those optimising the whole

competitive systems and practices tools relevant to the organisation and the processes

relevant legislation, regulation, codes of practice, contracts and the like

sustainability principles relevant to the process

influence, persuasion and negotiation methods.

The unit should be assessed holistically and the judgement of competence shall be based on a holistic assessment of the evidence.

The collection of performance evidence is best done from a report and/or folio of evidence drawn from:

a single project which provides sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria

multiple smaller projects which together provide sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria.

A third-party report, or similar, may be needed to testify to the work done by the individual, particularly when the project has been done as part of a project team.

Assessment should use a real review of kaizen processes used in an operational workplace.

Knowledge evidence may be collected concurrently with performance evidence or through an independent process such as workbooks, written assessments or interviews (provided a record is kept).

Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate.

Conditions for assessment must include access to all tools, equipment, materials and documentation required, including relevant workplace procedures, product and manufacturing specifications associated with this unit.

Foundation skills are integral to competent performance of the unit and should not be assessed separately.

Assessors must satisfy the assessor competency requirements that are in place at the time of the assessment as set by the VET regulator.

The assessor must demonstrate both technical competency and currency.

Technical competence can be demonstrated through:

relevant VET or other qualification/Statement of Attainment AND/OR

relevant workplace experience

Currency can be demonstrated through:

performing the competency being assessed as part of current employment OR

having consulted with an organisation providing relevant environmental monitoring, management or technology services about performing the competency being assessed within the last twelve months.

Copy and paste from the following performance criteria to create an observation checklist for each task. When you have finished writing your assessment tool every one of these must have been addressed, preferably several times in a variety of contexts. To ensure this occurs download the assessment matrix for the unit; enter each assessment task as a column header and place check marks against each performance criteria that task addresses.

Observation Checklist

Tasks to be observed according to workplace/college/TAFE policy and procedures, relevant legislation and Codes of Practice Yes No Comments/feedback
Review performance against current key performance indicators (KPIs). 
Review KPIs for ongoing relevance. 
Review current state of continuous improvement processes. 
Audit sustainability (social, ecological and economic) changes as a result of continuous improvement activity. 
Analyse problems to determine root cause. 
Identify areas for improvement to KPIs and continuous improvement processes. 
Prioritise areas requiring action. 
Develop a range of possible solutions, including taking into account the impact of the solution on any codes of practice, standards, contracts and commercial or industrial agreements. 
Discuss possible solutions and implications with stakeholders. 
Compare outcomes from possible solutions to competitive systems and practices philosophy. 
Choose actions which are most compatible with competitive philosophy. 
Draft implementation plan for chosen action. 
Obtain required approvals and modify plan, as required. 
Communicate changes to improvement processes to team members. 
Resolve issues and problems identified by team members. 
Obtain sign-off from process/system owner. 
Arrange for skills development as necessary. 
Arrange for required resources to be available. 
Establish and implement KPIs for modified continuous improvement process. 
Implement planned changes. 
Check the planned improvements have occurred. 
Take action to sustain improvement by standardising. 

Forms

Assessment Cover Sheet

MSS407013 - Review continuous improvement processes
Assessment task 1: [title]

Student name:

Student ID:

I declare that the assessment tasks submitted for this unit are my own work.

Student signature:

Result: Competent Not yet competent

Feedback to student

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assessor name:

Signature:

Date:


Assessment Record Sheet

MSS407013 - Review continuous improvement processes

Student name:

Student ID:

Assessment task 1: [title] Result: Competent Not yet competent

(add lines for each task)

Feedback to student:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overall assessment result: Competent Not yet competent

Assessor name:

Signature:

Date:

Student signature:

Date: